Comparing the Outcomes of Different Corneal Refractive Surgeries, Such as (Lasik) Laser Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis, (PRK) Photorefractive Keratectomy, and (Smile) Small Incision Lenticule Extraction
Published: 2024-05-17
Page: 113-119
Issue: 2024 - Volume 7 [Issue 1]
Nahla Adel Gamaleldin Sayed Shafie *
Mediclinic Hospitals, Baniyas Clinics, United Arab Emirates.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This literature review provides an in-depth analysis of visual outcomes, dry eye incidence, corneal sensitivity, and high-order aberrations (HOAs) associated with three common corneal refractive surgeries: Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (Trans-PRK), Laser-Assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK), and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE). In terms of visual outcomes, Trans-PRK demonstrates favorable efficacy and safety comparable to LASIK, with potential advantages in predictability. However, Trans-PRK adult patients may experience higher variability in spherical equivalent during the postoperative period. Conversely, SMILE exhibits comparable visual outcomes to LASIK, but with delayed visual acuity recovery possibly due to stromal edema. Comparative studies between Trans-PRK and SMILE are limited, but initial findings suggest SMILE may offer improved visual results and reduced residual astigmatism. Dry eye and corneal sensitivity post-surgery vary among procedures, influenced by factors such as nerve damage, flap size, and ablation size. PRK results in severance of corneal nerves, leading to temporary postoperative pain, whereas LASIK and SMILE show differing rates of reinnervation, with SMILE potentially preserving corneal sensitivity better due to its less invasive nature. High-order aberrations, affecting visual quality, differ among surgeries. Trans-PRK is believed to induce fewer aberrations due to greater corneal integrity compared to LASIK, while SMILE may lead to higher levels of coma and total HOAs in the early postoperative period.
Keywords: Visual outcomes, eye surgeries, small incision lenticule extraction, laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy, PRK
How to Cite
References
Lin M, Zhou H, Hu Z, Huang J, Lu F, Hu L. Comparison of small incision lenticule extraction and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in terms of visual quality in myopia patients. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2021;99(8):e1289-e96.
Woreta FA, Gupta A, Hochstetler B, Bower KS. Management of post-photorefractive keratectomy pain. Survey of ophthalmology. 2013;58(6):529-35.
Tomás-Juan J, Larranaga AM-G, Hanneken L. Corneal regeneration after photorefractive keratectomy: a review. Journal of Optometry. 2015;8(3):149-69.
Kaluzny BJ, Szkulmowski M, Bukowska DM, Wojtkowski M. Spectral OCT with speckle contrast reduction for evaluation of the healing process after PRK and transepithelial PRK. Biomedical optics express. 2014;5(4):1089-98.
Lawless M, Hodge C. Lasik. International Ophthalmology Clinics. 2013;53(1):111-28.
Mysore N, Krueger R. Advances in refractive surgery: May 2013 to June 2014. The Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology. 2015;4(2):112-20.
Ambrósio R, Wilson SE, editors. LASIK vs LASEK vs PRK: advantages and indications. Seminars in ophthalmology; 2003: Taylor & Francis.
Kobashi H, Kamiya K, Shimizu K. Dry eye after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser–assisted LASIK: a meta-analysis. Cornea. 2017;36(1):85-91.
Hyun S, Lee S, Kim J-h. Visual outcomes after SMILE, LASEK, and LASEK combined with corneal collagen cross-linking for high myopic correction. Cornea. 2017;36(4):399-405.
Ganesh S, Brar S, Patel U. Comparison of ReLEx SMILE and PRK in terms of visual and refractive outcomes for the correction of low myopia. International Ophthalmology. 2018;38:1147-54.
Jun I, Kang DSY, Reinstein DZ, Arba-Mosquera S, Archer TJ, Seo KY, et al. Clinical outcomes of SMILE with a triple centration technique and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK in high astigmatism. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2018;34(3):156-63.
Lee H, Kang DSY, Reinstein DZ, Arba-Mosquera S, Kim EK, Seo KY. Comparing corneal higher-order aberrations in corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus small-incision lenticule extraction. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2018;44(6): 725-33.
Mounir A, Mostafa EM, Ammar H, Mohammed OA, Alsmman AH, Farouk MM, et al. Clinical outcomes of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus femtosecond laser-assisted keratomileusis for correction of high myopia in South Egyptian population. International journal of ophthalmology. 2020;13(1):129.
Aslanides IM, Georgoudis PN, Selimis VD, Mukherjee AN. Single-step transepithelial ASLA (SCHWIND) with mitomycin-C for the correction of high myopia: long-term follow-up. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2014: 33-41.
Zhang J, Feng Q, Ding W, Peng Y, Long K. Comparison of clinical results between trans-PRK and femtosecond LASIK for correction of high myopia. BMC ophthalmology. 2020;20:1-10.
Luger MH, Ewering T, Arba-Mosquera S. Myopia correction with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus femtosecond− assisted laser in situ keratomileusis: One-year case-matched analysis. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2016;42(11):1579-87.
Naderi M, Sabour S, Khodakarim S, Daneshgar F. Studying the factors related to refractive error regression after PRK surgery. BMC ophthalmology. 2018;18:1-8.
Pokroy R, Mimouni M, Sela T, Munzer G, Kaiserman I. Myopic laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment: incidence and associations. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2016;42(10):1408-14.
Kobashi H, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Takahashi M, Shimizu K. Two-year results of small‐incision lenticule extraction and wavefront‐guided laser in situ keratomileusis for Myopia. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2018;96(2):e119-e26.
Aygün BT, Çankaya KI, Agca A, Yildirim Y, Yildiz BK, Sucu ME, et al. Five-year outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction vs femtosecond laser–assisted laser in situ keratomileusis: a contralateral eye study. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2020;46(3):403-9.
Ang M, Farook M, Htoon HM, Mehta JS. A randomized clinical trial comparing femtosecond LASIK and small-incision lenticule extraction. Ophthalmology. 2020; 127(6):724-30.
Zhang Y, Shen Q, Jia Y, Zhou D, Zhou J. Clinical outcomes of SMILE and FS-LASIK used to treat myopia: a meta-analysis. Journal of refractive surgery. 2016;32 (4):256-65.
Kataoka T, Nishida T, Murata A, Ito M, Isogai N, Horai R, et al. Control-matched comparison of refractive and visual outcomes between small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2018:865-73.
Ganesh S, Gupta R. Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism. Journal of refractive surgery. 2014;30(9):590-6.
Chiche A, Trinh L, Saada O, Faure J-F, Auclin F, Baudouin C, et al. Early recovery of quality of vision and optical performance after refractive surgery: small-incision lenticule extraction versus laser in situ keratomileusis. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2018;44(9): 1073-9.
Zhao PF, Hu YB, Wang Y, Fu CY, Zhang J, Zhai C-B. Comparison of correcting myopia and astigmatism with SMILE or FS-LASIK and postoperative higher-order aberrations. International Journal of Ophthalmology. 2021;14(4):523.
Zheng Z, Zhang M, Jhanji V, Sun L, Li J, Zhang R. Comparison between aberration-free transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and small incision lenticule extraction for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. International Ophthalmology. 2021;41:303-14.
Erie JC, McLaren JW, Hodge DO, Bourne WM. Recovery of Corneal Subbasal Nerve Density After PRK and LASIK. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2005;140(6): 1059-64.e1.
Lee JB, Ryu CH, Kim JH, Kim EK, Kim HB. Comparison of tear secretion and tear film instability after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis11None of the authors has a financial interest in any product mentioned. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2000;26(9):1326-31.
Bandeira F, Yusoff NZ, Yam GH-F, Mehta JS. Corneal re-innervation following refractive surgery treatments. Neural Regeneration Research. 2019;14(4):557-65.
Murakami Y, Manche EE. Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Self-reported Postoperative Dry Eye and Visual Fluctuation in LASIK and Photorefractive Keratectomy. Ophthalmology. 2012;119 (11):2220-4.
Bower KS, Sia RK, Ryan DS, Mines MJ, Dartt DA. Chronic dry eye in photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis: Manifestations, incidence, and predictive factors. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2015; 41(12):2624-34.
Toda I. Dry Eye After LASIK. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2018;59(14):DES109-DES15.
Cetinkaya S, Gulmez M, Mestan E, Ucar F, Ali N. Influence of Incision Size on Dry Eye Symptoms in the Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Procedure. Cornea. 2019;38(1): 18-23.
Liu YC, Jung ASJ, Chin JY, Yang LWY, Mehta JS. Cross-sectional Study on Corneal Denervation in Contralateral Eyes Following SMILE Versus LASIK. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2020;36(10): 653-60.
Jiang J, Jhanji V, Sun L, Li J, Zhang R. Comparison of visual quality after Femto-LASIK and TransPRK in patients with low and moderate myopia. International Ophthalmology. 2020;40(6):1419-28.
Zhang J, Feng Q, Ding W, Peng Y, Long K. Comparison of clinical results between trans-PRK and femtosecond LASIK for correction of high myopia. BMC Ophthalmology. 2020;20(1):243.
Chang J-Y, Lin P-Y, Hsu C-C, Liu CJ-L. Comparison of clinical outcomes of LASIK, Trans-PRK, and SMILE for correction of myopia. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2022;85(2):145-51.
Li M, Li M, Chen Y, Miao H, Yang D, Ni K, et al. Five-year results of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK (FS-LASIK) for myopia. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2019;97 (3):e373-e80.
Lin F, Xu Y, Yang Y. Comparison of the Visual Results After SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for Myopia. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2014;30(4):248-54.
Gulmez M, Tekce A, Kamıs U. Comparison of refractive outcomes and high-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for correcting high myopia and myopic astigmatism. International Ophthalmology. 2020;40(12): 3481-9.
Xia LK, Ma J, Liu HN, Shi C, Huang Q. Three-year results of small incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of high myopia and myopic astigmatism. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(3):470-7.
Miraftab M, Hashemi H, Aghamirsalim M, Fayyaz S, Asgari S. Matched comparison of corneal higher order aberrations induced by SMILE to femtosecond assisted LASIK and to PRK in correcting moderate and high myopia: 3.00mm vs. 6.00mm. BMC Ophthalmology. 2021;21(1):216.
Aygün BT, Çankaya Kİ, Ağca A, Yıldırım Y, Yıldız BK, Sucu ME, et al. Five-year outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction vs femtosecond laser–assisted laser in situ keratomileusis: a contralateral eye study. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2020;46(3):403-9.
Zheng Z, Zhang M, Jhanji V, Sun L, Li J, Zhang R. Comparison between aberration-free transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and small incision lenticule extraction for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. International Ophthalmology. 2021;41(1):303-14.
Lee H, Kang DSY, Reinstein DZ, Arba-Mosquera S, Kim EK, Seo KY, et al. Comparing corneal higher-order aberrations in corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus small-incision lenticule extraction. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 2018;44(6):725-33.