Main Article Content
Chemical eye injury is a true ocular emergency that requires a prompt decision and immediate management by using an irrigating solution to the eye. The development of a new solution, such as amphoteric agents are now used in comparison to conventional agents. This type of solution reacts rapidly with both acids and alkalis. It also has hypertonic properties, thus resulting in milder corneal edema and mobilizes the diffusion of corrosive agents out of the eye structure. Several studies indicated that the amphoteric solution had significantly better clinical and ocular outcomes compared to other irrigation fluids. Irrigation using amphoteric agents found to shorten the time of corneal reepithelization in Grade I-II chemical eye injury. It also resulted in a better outcome for visual acuity, pain intensity, severity of the injury, and less further complications. In conclusion, prompt eye irrigation using the amphoteric solution shown as a better alternative in chemical ocular injury. Thus, its usage may be suggested for future management for chemical eye injury.
Pargament J, Correa ZM, Augsburger JJ. Ophthalmic trauma. In: Riordan-Eva P, Augsburger JJ. Vaughan & Asbury’s General Ophthalmology, 19th Edition. New York: McGraw Hill. 2018;836-837.
Mashige K. Chemical and thermal ocular burns: A review of causes, clinical features and management protocol. South African Family Practice. 2016;58(1):1-4.
Lewis CJ, Al-Mousawi A, Jha A, Allison KP. Is it time for a change in the approach to chemical burns? The role of Diphoterine® in the management of cutaneous and ocular chemical injuries. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70(5): 563-567.
Haring RS, Sheffield ID, Channa R, Canner JK, Schneider EB. Epidemiologic trends of chemical ocular burns in the United States. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(10):1119-1124.
Wiesner N, Dutescu RM, Uthoff D, Kottek A, Reim M, Schrage N. First aid therapy for corrosive chemical eye burns: Results of a 30-year longitudinal study with two different decontamination concepts. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(8):1795-1803.
Singh P, Tyagi M, Kumar Y, Gupta KK, Sharma PD. Ocular chemical injuries and their management. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2013;6:83-86.
Kuckelkorn R, Schrage N, Keller G, Redbrake C. Emergency treatment of chemical and thermal eye burns. Acta Ophth Scan. 2002;80(1):4-10.
Salmon JF. Kanski’s clinical ophthalmology: A systematic approach, 9th Edition. China: El Sevier. 2020;912-916.
Kompa S, Schareck B, Tympner J, Wüstemeyer H, Schrage NF. Comparison of emergency eye-wash products in burned porcine eyes. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240(4):308-313.
Hughes WF. Alkali burns of the eye. Arch Ophthalmol. 1946;35:423-436.
Roper-Hall MJ. Thermal and chemical burns of the eye. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1965;85:631-646.
Dua H, King AJ, Joseph A. A new classification of ocular surface burns. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85(11):1379-1383.
Schrage NF, Schlossmacher B, Aschenbrenner W, Langefeld S. Phosphate buffer in alkali eye burns as an inducer of experimental corneal calcification. Burns. 2001;27:459-464.
Schrage NF, Kompa S, Haller W, Langefeld S. Use of an amphoteric lavage solution for emergency treatment of eye burns: First animal type experimental clinical considerations. Burns. 2002;28(8): 782-786.
Rihawi S, Frentz M, Schrage FM. Emergency treatment of eye burns: Which rinsing solution should we choose? Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244:845-854.
Merle H, Donnio A, Ayeboua L, et al. Alkali ocular burns in Martinique (French West Indies): Evaluation of the use of an amphoteric solution as the rinsing product. Burns. 2005;31:205-211.
Goldich Y, Barkana Y, Zadok D, Avni I, Berenshtein E, Rosner M, Chevion M. Use of amphoteric rinsing solution for treatment of ocular tissues exposed to nitrogen mustard. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(1): e35-40.
Fortin JL, Fontaine M, Bodson L, Depil-Duvala A, Bitar MP, Macher JM, et al. Use of an amphoteric solution in eye, skin and oral chemical exposures: Retrospective multicenter clinical case series. J Clin Toxicol. 2017;7(2):1-9.