Axial Length Analysis in Patients with Retinal Detachment in New Zealand
Published: 2024-03-20
Page: 47-52
Issue: 2024 - Volume 7 [Issue 1]
Patchara Jirapanyayut *
University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Francesc March de Ribot
University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Jerry Goh
University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Anna March de Ribot
University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Aim: The aim of the study is to analyse the axial length (AL) in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in Dunedin Public Hospital (New Zealand).
Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on the records of 105 patients who underwent retinal surgery with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in Dunedin Public Hospital between 1 January 2020 and 1 January 2022. AL was collected with a Zeiss IOL Master500. Data was compared to matched control groups: Dunedin patients requiring cataract surgery, a previous study of healthy individuals from Dunedin (Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health & Development Study) and an Auckland control group comprising of two publications of patients in Auckland undergoing cataract surgery.
Results: Total data of 108 eyes of 105 patients, of which 42 were female and 63 were male, with an average age of 63.25± 16.40 years (mean ± SD), was included in this study. The mean AL of the patients was 24.30 ± 0.33 mm compared to the control group of 23.48 ± 0.06 mm. The difference in AL between RRD patients and the Auckland control group was 0.82 ± 0.23 mm, p<0.0001. The difference in AL between the RRD and the Dunedin Cataract surgery group was 0.75 ± 0.29, p<0.0001. The difference between male and female mean AL was 0.75 ± 0.67 mm, p < 0.0285.
Conclusion: Patients with RRD have been shown to have a greater AL when compared to those without, with a difference of 0.82 ± 0.23 mm representing approximately 2.2 diopters. Men have a greater mean AL when compared to women, with a difference of 0.75 ± 0.67mm, p < 0.0285 representing approximately 2.0 diopters.
Keywords: Axial length, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, retinal detachment, New Zealand Axial length
How to Cite
References
D’Amico DJ. Primary Retinal Detachment. Published online November 27, 2008. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMcp0804591
Austin KL, Palmer JR, Seddon JM, et al. Case-Control Study of Idiopathic Retinal Detachment. Int J Epidemiol. 1990;19(4): 1045-1050.
Group TEDCCS, The Eye Disease Case-Control Study Group. Risk Factors for Idiopathic Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1993;137(7):749-757. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116735
Kim MS, Park SJ, Park KH, Woo SJ. Different Mechanistic Association of Myopia with Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment between Young and Elderly Patients. Biomed Res Int. 2019; 2019.
DOI: 10.1155/2019/5357241
Mitry D, Charteris DG, Fleck BW, Campbell H, Singh J. The epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: Geographical variation and clinical associations. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(6): 678-684.
Polkinghorne PJ, Craig JP. Northern New Zealand Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Study: epidemiology and risk factors. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2004; 32(2):159-163.
Pan CW, Ramamurthy D, Saw SM. Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012; 32(1):3-16.
Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia. Lancet. 2012;379(9827):1739-1748.
Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123(5):1036-1042.
Cruickshank FE, Logan NS. Optical “dampening” of the refractive error to axial length ratio: implications for outcome measures in myopia control studies. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38(3):290-297.
Atchison DA, Jones CE, Schmid KL, et al. Eye Shape in Emmetropia and Myopia. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2004;45(10):3380. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-0292
Yoon JJ, Misra SL, McGhee CNJ, Patel DV. Demographics and ocular biometric characteristics of patients undergoing cataract surgery in Auckland, New Zealand. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology. 2016;44(2):106-113. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.12634
Riley AF, Grupcheva CN, Malik TY, Craig JP, McGhee CN. The Auckland Cataract Study: Demographic, corneal topographic and ocular biometric parameters. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2001;29(6):381-386.
Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Miraftab M, et al. The distribution of axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and vitreous chamber depth in an adult population of Shahroud, Iran. BMC Ophthalmology. 2012;12(1). DOI: 10.1186/1471-2415-12-50
Shufelt C, Fraser-Bell S, Ying-Lai M, Torres M, Varma R. Refractive Error, Ocular Biometry, and Lens Opalescence in an Adult Population: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2005; 46(12):4450. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-0435
Bhagwandien ACE, Cheng YYY, Wolfs RCW, van Meurs JC, Luyten GPM. Relationship between retinal detachment and biometry in 4262 cataractous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(4):643-649.
Abou-Shousha M, Helaly HA, Osman IM. The accuracy of axial length measurements in cases of macula-off retinal detachment. Can J Ophthalmol. 2016;51(2):108-112.
Kim YK, Woo SJ, Hyon JY, Ahn J, Park KH. Refractive outcomes of combined phacovitrectomy and delayed cataract surgery in retinal detachment. Can J Ophthalmol. 2015;50(5):360-366.
Do DV, Hawkins BS, Gichuhi S, Vedula SS. Surgery for post-vitrectomy cataract. Cochrane Database o Systematic Reviews.
Published online 2008. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006366.pub2
Cole CJ, Charteris DG. Cataract extraction after retinal detachment repair by vitrectomy: Visual outcome and complications. Eye. 2009;23(6):1377-1381. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2008.255
Feng H, Adelman RA. Cataract formation following vitreoretinal procedures. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:1957-1965.
Bjerrum SS, Mikkelsen KL, La Cour M. Risk of Pseudophakic Retinal Detachment in 202 226 Patients Using the Fellow Nonoperated Eye as Reference. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(12):2573- 2579. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.045